<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-25T06:06:25Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="22648" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:22648</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-04-17T05:31:49Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Estimating Euclidean Distance to Linearity</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Bogdanov, Andrej</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Taschin, Lorenzo</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>sublinear-time algorithms</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>statistical estimation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>analysis of boolean functions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>property testing</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>regression</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Given oracle access to a real-valued function on the n-dimensional Boolean cube, how many queries does it take to estimate the squared Euclidean distance to its closest linear function within ε? Our main result is that O(log³(1/ε) ⋅ 1/ε²) queries suffice. Not only is the query complexity independent of n but it is optimal up to the polylogarithmic factor.&#13;
Our estimator evaluates f on pairs correlated by noise rates chosen to cancel out the low-degree contributions to f while leaving the linear part intact. The query complexity is optimized when the noise rates are multiples of Chebyshev nodes.&#13;
In contrast, we show that the dependence on n is unavoidable in two closely related settings. For estimation from random samples, Θ(√n/ε + 1/ε²) samples are necessary and sufficient. For agnostically learning a linear approximation with ε mean-square regret under the uniform distribution, Ω(n/√ε) nonadaptively chosen queries are necessary, while O(n/ε) random samples are known to be sufficient (Linial, Mansour, and Nisan). &#13;
Our upper bounds apply to functions with bounded 4-norm. Our lower bounds apply even to ± 1-valued functions.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Andrej Bogdanov and Lorenzo Taschin</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.20</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226481</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.20</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
