<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-22T04:54:15Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="22658" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:22658</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-04-17T05:31:56Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Provability of the Circuit Size Hierarchy and Its Consequences</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Carmosino, Marco</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Kabanets, Valentine</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Kolokolova, Antonina</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>C. Oliveira, Igor</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Tsintsilidas, Dimitrios</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Bounded Arithmetic</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Circuit Complexity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Hierarchy Theorems</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>The Circuit Size Hierarchy (CSH^a_b) states that if a &gt; b ≥ 1 then the set of functions on n variables computed by Boolean circuits of size n^a is strictly larger than the set of functions computed by circuits of size n^b. This result, which is a cornerstone of circuit complexity theory, follows from the non-constructive proof of the existence of functions of large circuit complexity obtained by Shannon in 1949. &#13;
Are there more "constructive" proofs of the Circuit Size Hierarchy? Can we quantify this? Motivated by these questions, we investigate the provability of CSH^a_b in theories of bounded arithmetic. Among other contributions, we establish the following results:  &#13;
i) Given any a &gt; b &gt; 1, CSH^a_b is provable in Buss’s theory 𝖳²₂. &#13;
ii) In contrast, if there are constants a &gt; b &gt; 1 such that CSH^a_b is provable in the theory 𝖳¹₂, then there is a constant ε &gt; 0 such that 𝖯^NP requires non-uniform circuits of size at least n^{1 + ε}.  In other words, an improved upper bound on the proof complexity of CSH^a_b would lead to new lower bounds in complexity theory. &#13;
We complement these results with a proof of the Formula Size Hierarchy (FSH^a_b) in PV₁ with parameters a &gt; 2 and b = 3/2. This is in contrast with typical formalizations of complexity lower bounds in bounded arithmetic, which require APC₁ or stronger theories and are not known to hold even in 𝖳¹₂.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Marco Carmosino and Valentine Kabanets and Antonina Kolokolova and Igor C. Oliveira and Dimitrios Tsintsilidas</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.30</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226586</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.30</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
