2026-07-23T07:03:11Z https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai

oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:2325 2024-03-06T10:33:18Z ddc:004 open_access

Bounded Size Graph Clustering with Applications to Stream Processing Khandekar, Rohit Hildrum, Kirsten Parekh, Sujay Rajan, Deepak Sethuraman, Jay Wolf, Joel Graph partitioning uncrossing Gomory-Hu trees symmetric submodular functions We introduce a graph clustering problem motivated by a stream processing application. Input to our problem is an undirected graph with vertex and edge weights. A cluster is a subset of the vertices. The {\em size} of a cluster is defined as the total vertex weight in the subset plus the total edge weight at the boundary of the cluster. The bounded size graph clustering problem ($\GC$) is to partition the vertices into clusters of size at most a given budget and minimize the total edge-weight across the clusters. In the {\em multiway cut} version of the problem, we are also given a subset of vertices called {\em terminals}. No cluster is allowed to contain more than one terminal. Our problem differs from most of the previously studied clustering problems in that the number of clusters is not specified. We first show that the feasibility version of the multiway cut $\GC$ problem, i.e., determining if there exists a clustering with bounded-size clusters satisfying the multiway cut constraint, can be solved in polynomial time. Our algorithm is based on the min-cut subroutine and an uncrossing argument. This result is in contrast with the NP-hardness of the min-max multiway cut problem, considered by Svitkina and Tardos (2004), in which the number of clusters must equal the number of terminals. Our results for the feasibility version also generalize to any symmetric submodular function. We next show that the optimization version of $\GC$ is NP-hard by showing an approximation-preserving reduction from the $\frac 13$-balanced cut problem. Our main result is an $O(\log^2 n)$-approximation to the optimization version of the multiway cut $\GC$ problem violating the budget by an $O(\log n)$ factor, where $n$ denotes the number of vertices. Our algorithm is based on a set-cover-like greedy approach which iteratively computes bounded-size clusters to maximize the number of new vertices covered. Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik Rohit Khandekar and Kirsten Hildrum and Sujay Parekh and Deepak Rajan and Jay Sethuraman and Joel Wolf 2009 Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 4, IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (2009) InProceedings Text doc-type:ResearchArticle publishedVersion application/pdf doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2009.2325 urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-23250 https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2009.2325 eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode