<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-23T08:19:37Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="23318" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:23318</identifier>
        <datestamp>2025-06-25T13:20:37Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Lightweight Diagramming for Lightweight Formal Methods: A Grounded Language Design</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Prasad, Siddhartha</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Greenman, Ben</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Nelson, Tim</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Krishnamurthi, Shriram</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>formal methods</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>diagramming</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>visualization</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>language design</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Tools such as Alloy enable users to incrementally define, explore, verify, and diagnose specifications for complex systems. A critical component of these tools is a visualizer that lets users graphically explore generated models. As we show, however, a default visualizer that knows nothing about the domain can be unhelpful and can even actively violate presentational and cognitive principles. At the other extreme, full-blown custom visualization requires significant effort as well as knowledge that a tool user might not possess. Custom visualizations can also exhibit bad (even silent) failures.&#13;
This paper charts a middle ground between the extremes of default and fully-customizable visualization. We capture essential domain information for lightweight diagramming, embodying this in a language. To identify key elements of lightweight diagrams, we ground the language design in both the cognitive science research on diagrams and in a corpus of 58 custom visualizations. We distill from these sources a small set of orthogonal primitives, and use the primitives to guide a diagramming language called Cope-and-Drag (CnD). We evaluate it on sample tasks, three user studies, and performance, and find that short CnD specifications consistently improve model comprehension over the Alloy default. CnD thus defines a new point in the design space of diagramming: a language that is lightweight, effective, and driven by sound principles.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Siddhartha Prasad and Ben Greenman and Tim Nelson and Shriram Krishnamurthi</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.26</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233187</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.26</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
