<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-25T12:50:18Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="23590" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:23590</identifier>
        <datestamp>2025-10-27T10:21:50Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Real-Time System Evaluation Techniques: A Systematic Mapping Study</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Unte, Tilmann L.</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Altmeyer, Sebastian</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Systematic Mapping Study</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Real-Time Systems</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Evaluation</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>A systematic mapping study assesses a broad selection of research publications with the aim of categorizing them according to a research question. We present the first systematic mapping study on evaluation practices within the field of real-time systems, by analyzing publications from the top three conferences ECRTS, RTAS, and RTSS from 2017 until 2024. Our study provides a comprehensive view on the evaluation practices prevalent in our community, including benchmark software, task set and graph generators, case studies, industrial challenges, and custom solutions.&#13;
Based on our study, we construct and publish a dataset enabling quantitative analysis of evaluation practices within the real-time systems community.&#13;
Our analysis indicates shortcomings in current practice: custom case studies are abundant, while industrial challenges have very minor impact. Reproducibility has only been shown for a small subset of evaluations and there is no indication of change. Adoption of new and improved tools and benchmarks is very slow or even non-existent.&#13;
Evaluation must not be viewed as an obligation when publishing a paper, but as a key element in ensuring practicability, comparability, and reproducibility. Based on our study, we conclude that our community currently falls short on these objectives.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Tilmann L. Unte and Sebastian Altmeyer</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 335, 37th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS 2025)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2025.12</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-235903</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2025.12</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
