<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-01T05:09:04Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="23597" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:23597</identifier>
        <datestamp>2025-07-07T04:33:34Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Revisiting Timing Anomalies in Predictable In-Order Pipelines</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Rouizi, Lilia</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Asavoae, Mihail</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Binder, Benjamin</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Rieg, Lionel</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Brandner, Florian</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Timing Anomalies</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Causality</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Timing Predictability</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Timing Analysis</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>The quality of timing guarantees ensured through worst-case-execution time analysis and schedulability tests - required to be both sound and precise - is directly influenced by the predictability properties of the execution platform. A platform is considered predictable when safe and precise bounds can be computed through analysis tools. Counter-intuitive and Amplification Timing Anomalies (TAs) are detrimental to predictability and thus may make it much harder/impossible to compute such bounds. In order to address this issue, research has followed two orthogonal approaches, (i) designing predictable execution platforms and (ii) characterizing counter-intuitive TAs through formal definitions. However, predictable designs rarely apply any formal definitions of timing anomalies.&#13;
This paper aims at investigating precisely this relationship. We first show how a previously proposed definition of counter-intuitive TAs can be applied to the predictable in-order processor SIC. We then extend this approach in order to provide the first formal definition of both counter-intuitive and amplification effects. The proposed definitions are then evaluated on a regular in-order processor as well as the predictable SIC core using a systematic approach that allows to assess their applicability and relevance. Finally, we prove, for the first time, the absence of some, but not all, TA effects in SIC.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Lilia Rouizi and Mihail Asavoae and Benjamin Binder and Lionel Rieg and Florian Brandner</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 335, 37th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS 2025)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2025.19</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-235974</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2025.19</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
