<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-15T16:33:14Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="2362" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:2362</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:08:57Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Geometry of abstraction in quantum computation</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Pavlovic, Dusko</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Quantum algorithms</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>categorical semantics</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Frobenius algebra</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>classical structure</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Modern cryptography is based on various assumptions about computational hardness and feasibility. But while computability is a very robust notion (cf Church's Thesis), feasibility seems quite sensitive to the available computational resources. A prime example are, of course, quantum channels, which provide feasible solutions of some otherwise hard problems; but ants' pheromones, used as a computational resource, also provide feasible solutions of other hard problems. So at least in principle, modern cryptography is concerned with the power and availability of computational resources.&#13;
&#13;
The standard models, used in cryptography and in quantum computation, leave a lot to be desired in this respect. They do, of course, support many interesting solutions of deep problems; but besides the fundamental computational structures, they also capture some low level features of particular implementations. In technical terms of program semantics, our standard models are not *fully abstract*. (Related objections can be traced back to von Neumann's "I don't believe in Hilbert spaces" letters from 1937.)&#13;
&#13;
I shall report on some explorations towards extending the modeling tools of program semantics to develop a geometric language for quantum protocols and algorithms. Besides hiding the irrelevant implementation details, its abstract descriptions can also be used to explore simple nonstandard models. If the time permits, I shall describe a method to implement teleportation, as well as the hidden subgroup algorithms, using just abelian groups and relations.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Dusko Pavlovic</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2010</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 9311, Classical and Quantum Information Assurance Foundations and Practice (2010)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.09311.2</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-23623</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.09311.2</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
