<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-21T12:28:44Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="23647" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:23647</identifier>
        <datestamp>2025-10-27T10:30:38Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Interpolation as Cut-Introduction: On the Computational Content of Craig-Lyndon Interpolation</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Saurin, Alexis</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Classical Logic</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Interpolation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Cut Elimination</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Linear Logic</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Sequent calculus</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>System L</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Analyzing Maehara’s method for proving Craig’s interpolation theorem, we extract a "proof relevant" interpolation theorem for first-order LL in the sense that if π is a cut-free sequent proof of A⊢ B, we can find a formula C in the common vocabulary of A and B and proofs π₁,π₂ of A⊢ C and C⊢ B respectively such that π₁ composed with π₂ cut-reduces to π. As a direct corollary, we get similar proof relevant interpolation results for LJ and LK using linear translations. This refined interpolation is then rephrased in terms of a cut-introduction process synthetizing the interpolant. &#13;
Finally, we analyze the computational content of interpolation by proving an interpolation result for Curien and Herbelin’s Duality of Computation.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Alexis Saurin</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.32</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236478</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.32</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
