<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-15T11:09:01Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="23723" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:23723</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-04-13T10:00:51Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Generalised Linial-Nisan Conjecture Is False for DNFs</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Alekseev, Yaroslav</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Göös, Mika</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Guan, Ziyi</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Maystre, Gilbert</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Riazanov, Artur</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Sokolov, Dmitry</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Yuan, Weiqiang</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>pseudorandomness</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>DNFs</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>bounded independence</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Aaronson (STOC 2010) conjectured that almost k-wise independence fools constant-depth circuits; he called this the generalised Linial-Nisan conjecture. Aaronson himself later found a counterexample for depth-3 circuits. We give here an improved counterexample for depth-2 circuits (DNFs). This shows, for instance, that Bazzi’s celebrated result (k-wise independence fools DNFs) cannot be generalised in a natural way. We also propose a way to circumvent our counterexample: We define a new notion of pseudorandomness called local couplings and show that it fools DNFs and even decision lists.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Yaroslav Alekseev and Mika Göös and Ziyi Guan and Gilbert Maystre and Artur Riazanov and Dmitry Sokolov and Weiqiang Yuan</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.29</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237231</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.29</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
