<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-16T05:15:15Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="23728" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:23728</identifier>
        <datestamp>2025-10-27T10:42:55Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Witness Encryption and NP-Hardness of Learning</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Goldberg, Halley</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Kabanets, Valentine</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>agnostic PAC learning</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>witness encryption</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>NP-hardness</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We study connections between two fundamental questions from computer science theory. (1) Is witness encryption possible for NP [Sanjam Garg et al., 2013]? That is, given an instance x of an NP-complete language L, can one encrypt a secret message with security contingent on the ability to provide a witness for x ∈ L? (2) Is computational learning (in the sense of [Leslie G. Valiant, 1984; Michael J. Kearns et al., 1994]) hard for NP? That is, is there a polynomial-time reduction from instances of L to instances of learning?&#13;
Our main contribution is that certain formulations of NP-hardness of learning characterize the existence of witness encryption for NP. More specifically, we show:  &#13;
- witness encryption for a language L ∈ NP is equivalent to a half-Levin reduction from L to the Computational Gap Learning problem (denoted CGL [Benny Applebaum et al., 2008]),  where a half-Levin reduction is the same as a Levin reduction but only required to preserve witnesses in one direction, and CGL formalizes agnostic learning as a decision problem. We show versions of the statement above for witness encryption secure against non-uniform and uniform adversaries. We also show that witness encryption for NP with ciphertexts of logarithmic length, along with a circuit lower bound for E, are together equivalent to NP-hardness of a generalized promise version of MCSP.&#13;
We complement the above with a number of unconditional NP-hardness results for agnostic PAC learning. Extending a result of [Shuichi Hirahara, 2022] to the standard setting of boolean circuits, we show NP-hardness of "semi-proper" learning. Namely:  &#13;
- for some polynomial s, it is NP-hard to agnostically learn circuits of size s(n) by circuits of size s(n)⋅ n^{1/(log log n)^O(1)}.  Looking beyond the computational model of standard boolean circuits enables us to prove NP-hardness of improper learning (ie. without a restriction on the size of hypothesis returned by the learner). We obtain such results for:  &#13;
- learning circuits with oracle access to a given randomly sampled string, and &#13;
- learning RAM programs.  In particular, we show that a variant of MINLT [Ker-I Ko, 1991] for RAM programs is NP-hard with parameters corresponding to the setting of improper learning. We view these results as partial progress toward the ultimate goal of showing NP-hardness of learning boolean circuits in an improper setting.&#13;
Lastly, we give some consequences of NP-hardness of learning for private- and public-key cryptography. Improving a main result of [Benny Applebaum et al., 2008], we show that if improper agnostic PAC learning is NP-hard under a randomized non-adaptive reduction (with some restrictions), then NP ⊈ BPP implies the existence of i.o. one-way functions. In contrast, if CGL is NP-hard under a half-Levin reduction, then NP ⊈ BPP implies the existence of i.o. public-key encryption.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Halley Goldberg and Valentine Kabanets</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.34</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237281</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.34</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
