<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-09-18T02:43:11Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="23951" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:23951</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-05T18:37:12Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Linear Temporal Logic with Standpoint Modalities (Invited Talk)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Baier, Christel</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Linear Temporal Logic</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>LTL</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>standpoint logics</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>multi-modal logic</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>model checking</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Standpoint logics have been introduced in recent work by Alvarez et al. as a multi-modal logic to reason about the integrated knowledge of multiple agents that might have different, possibly contradicting views ("standpoints"). The essential new feature are modalities for expressing that a property is conceivable according to the view of an agent. The talk considers the model checking problem for a standpoint extension of classical linear temporal logic (LTL) with five semantics for the standpoint modalities. The semantics differ in the information an agent can extract from the history. Starting with a generic non-elementary model checking algorithm that is applicable to all five semantics, a more detailed complexity analysis leads to improved upper bounds for four of the semantics. In three cases, the model checking problem turns out to be PSPACE-complete, i.e., not harder than the model checking problem for classical LTL, which stands in contrast to the known EXPSPACE-completeness result for the satisfiability problem for standpoint LTL.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Christel Baier</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 348, 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.1</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-239513</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.1</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
