<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-22T03:53:32Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="23972" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:23972</identifier>
        <datestamp>2025-11-12T13:25:10Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Partial-Order Reduction Is Hard</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Herbreteau, Frédéric</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Larroze-Jardiné, Sarah</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Walukiewicz, Igor</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Formal verification</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Concurrent systems</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Partial-order reduction</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Complexity</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>The goal of partial-order methods is to accelerate the exploration of concurrent systems by examining only a representative subset of all possible runs. The stateful approach builds a transition system with representative runs, while the stateless method simply enumerates them. The stateless approach may be preferable if the transition system is tree-like; otherwise, the stateful method is more effective.&#13;
In the last decade, optimality has been a guiding principle for developing stateless partial-order reduction algorithms, and without doubt contributed to big progress in the field. In this paper we ask if we can get a similar principle for the stateful approach. We show that in stateful exploration, a polynomially close to optimal partial-order algorithm cannot exist unless P=NP. The result holds even for acyclic programs with just await instructions. This lower bound result justifies systematic study of heuristics for stateful partial-order reduction. We propose a notion of IFS oracle as a useful abstraction. The oracle can be used to get a very simple optimal stateless algorithm, which can then be adapted to a non-optimal stateful algorithm. While in general the oracle problem is NP-hard, we show a simple case where it can be solved in linear time.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Frédéric Herbreteau and Sarah Larroze-Jardiné and Igor Walukiewicz</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 348, 36th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2025)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.22</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-239727</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2025.22</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
