<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-23T19:56:47Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="24160" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:24160</identifier>
        <datestamp>2025-11-12T13:33:50Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Wait-Only Broadcast Protocols Are Easier to Verify</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Guillou, Lucie</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Sangnier, Arnaud</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Sznajder, Nathalie</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Parameterised verification</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Reachability</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Broadcast</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We study networks of processes that all execute the same finite-state protocol and communicate via broadcasts. We are interested in two problems with a parameterized number of processes: the synchronization problem which asks whether there is an execution which puts all processes on a given state; and the repeated coverability problem which asks if there is an infinite execution where a given transition is taken infinitely often. Since both problems are undecidable in the general case, we investigate those problems when the protocol is Wait-Only, i.e., it has no state from which a process can both broadcast and receive messages. We establish that the synchronization problem becomes Ackermann-complete, and the repeated coverability problem is in ExpSpace and PSpace-hard.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Lucie Guillou and Arnaud Sangnier and Nathalie Sznajder</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 345, 50th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2025)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.53</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-241609</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.53</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
