<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-22T21:48:14Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="2422" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:2422</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:09:01Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Inductive Theorem Proving meets Dependency Pairs</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Swiderski, Stephan</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Parting, Michael</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Giesl, Jürgen</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Fuhs, Carsten</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Schneider-Kamp, Peter</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Termination</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Term Rewriting</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Dependency Pairs</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Inductive Theorem Proving</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Current techniques and tools for automated termination analysis of term rewrite systems (TRSs) are already very powerful. However, they fail for algorithms whose termination is essentially due to an inductive argument. Therefore, we show how to couple the dependency pair method for TRS termination with inductive theorem proving. As confirmed by the implementation of our new approach in the tool AProVE, now TRS termination techniques are also successful on this important class of algorithms.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Stephan Swiderski and Michael Parting and Jürgen Giesl and Carsten Fuhs and Peter Schneider-Kamp</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2010</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 9411, Interaction versus Automation: The two Faces of Deduction (2010)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.09411.4</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-24220</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.09411.4</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
