<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-25T01:46:57Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="24271" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:24271</identifier>
        <datestamp>2025-11-12T13:39:41Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Grandchildren-Weight-Balanced Binary Search Trees</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Jugé, Vincent</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Data structures</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Balanced binary trees</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We revisit weight-balanced trees, also known as trees of bounded balance. Invented by Nievergelt and Reingold in 1972, these trees are obtained by assigning a weight to each node and requesting that the weight of each node should be quite larger than the weights of its children, the precise meaning of "quite larger" depending on a real-valued parameter γ. Blum and Mehlhorn then showed how to maintain them in a recursive (bottom-up) fashion when 2/11 ⩽ γ ⩽ 1-1/√2, their algorithm requiring only an amortised constant number of tree rebalancing operations per update (insertion or deletion). Later, in 1993, Lai and Wood proposed a top-down procedure for updating these trees when 2/11 ⩽ γ ⩽ 1/4.&#13;
Our contribution is two-fold. First, we strengthen the requirements of Nievergelt and Reingold, by also requesting that each node should have a substantially larger weight than its grandchildren, thereby obtaining what we call grandchildren-balanced trees. Grandchildren-balanced trees are not harder to maintain than weight-balanced trees, but enjoy a smaller node depth, both in the worst case (with a 6 % decrease) and on average (with a 1.6 % decrease). In particular, unlike standard weight-balanced trees, all grandchildren-balanced trees with n nodes are of height less than 2 log₂(n).&#13;
Second, we adapt the algorithm of Lai and Wood to all weight-balanced trees, i.e., to all parameter values γ such that 2/11 ⩽ γ ⩽ 1-1/√2. More precisely, we adapt it to all grandchildren-balanced trees for which 1/4 &lt; γ ⩽ 1 - 1/√2. Finally, we show that, except in limit cases (where, for instance, γ = 1 - 1/√2), all these algorithms result in making a constant amortised number of tree rebalancing operations per tree update.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Vincent Jugé</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 349, 19th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2025)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.40</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-242710</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.40</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
