<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-08T15:23:57Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="24274" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:24274</identifier>
        <datestamp>2025-11-12T12:39:43Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>On the Complexity of Finding 1-Center Spanning Trees</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Lee, Pin-Hsian</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Tsai, Meng-Tsung</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Wang, Hung-Lung</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Treeradius</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Spanning tree polytope</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Shortest s</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>t-path polytope</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We consider the problem of finding a spanning tree T of a given undirected graph G such that any other spanning tree can be obtained from T by removing k edges and subsequently adding k edges, where k is minimized over all spanning trees of G. We refer to this minimum k as the treeradius of G. &#13;
Treeradius is an interesting graph parameter with natural interpretations: (1) It is the smallest radius of a Hamming ball centered at an extreme point of the spanning tree polytope that covers the entire polytope. (2) Any graph with bounded treeradius also has bounded treewidth. Consequently, if a problem admits a fixed-parameter algorithm parameterized by treewidth, it also admits a fixed-parameter algorithm parameterized by treeradius. &#13;
In this paper, we show that computing the exact treeradius for n-vertex graphs requires 2^Ω(n) time under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) and does not admit a PTAS, with an inapproximability bound of 1153/1152, unless P = NP. This hardness result is surprising, as treeradius has significantly higher ETH complexity compared to analogous problems on shortest path polytopes and star subgraph polytopes.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Pin-Hsian Lee and Meng-Tsung Tsai and Hung-Lung Wang</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 349, 19th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2025)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.43</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-242743</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.43</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
