<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-17T09:43:45Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="24362" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:24362</identifier>
        <datestamp>2025-12-12T14:53:43Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Key-Agreement with Perfect Completeness from Random Oracles</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Mazor, Noam</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Key-Agreement</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Random Oracle</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Merkle’s Puzzles</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Perfect Completeness</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>In the Random Oracle Model (ROM) all parties have oracle access to a common random function, and the parties are limited in the number of queries they can make to the oracle. The Merkle’s Puzzles protocol, introduced by Merkle [CACM '78], is a key-agreement protocol in the ROM with a quadratic gap between the query complexity of the honest parties and the eavesdropper. This quadratic gap is known to be optimal, by the works of Impagliazzo and Rudich [STOC ’89] and Barak and Mahmoody [Crypto ’09].&#13;
When the oracle function is injective or a permutation, Merkle’s Puzzles has perfect completeness. That is, it is certain that the protocol results in agreement between the parties. However, without such an assumption on the random function, there is a small error probability, and the parties may end up holding different keys. This fact raises the question: Is there a key-agreement protocol with perfect completeness and super-linear security in the ROM?&#13;
In this paper we give a positive answer to the above question, showing that changes to the query distribution of the parties in Merkle’s Puzzles, yield a protocol with perfect completeness and roughly the same security.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Noam Mazor</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 343, 6th Conference on Information-Theoretic Cryptography (ITC 2025)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ITC.2025.12</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-243628</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITC.2025.12</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
