<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-21T14:18:37Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="24392" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:24392</identifier>
        <datestamp>2025-12-12T15:01:24Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Non-Adaptive Evaluation of k-of- n Functions: Tight Gap and a Unit-Cost PTAS</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Nielsen, Mads Anker</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Rohwedder, Lars</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Schewior, Kevin</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Approximation scheme</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Boolean functions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>stochastic combinatorial optimization</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>stochastic function evaluation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>sequential testing</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>adaptivity</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We consider the Stochastic Boolean Function Evaluation (SBFE) problem in the well-studied case of k-of-n functions: There are independent Boolean random variables x_1,… ,x_n where each variable i has a known probability p_i of taking value 1, and a known cost c_i that can be paid to find out its value. The value of the function is 1 iff there are at least k 1s among the variables. The goal is to efficiently compute a strategy that, at minimum expected cost, tests the variables until the function value is determined. While an elegant polynomial-time exact algorithm is known when tests can be made adaptively, we focus on the non-adaptive variant, for which much less is known.&#13;
First, we show a clean and tight lower bound of 2 on the adaptivity gap, i.e., the worst-case multiplicative loss in the objective function caused by disallowing adaptivity, of the problem. This improves the tight lower bound of 3/2 for the unit-cost variant.&#13;
Second, we give a PTAS for computing the best non-adaptive strategy in the unit-cost case, the first PTAS for an SBFE problem. At the core, our scheme establishes a novel notion of two-sided dominance (w.r.t. the optimal solution) by guessing so-called milestone tests for a set of carefully chosen buckets of tests. To turn this technique into a polynomial-time algorithm, we use a decomposition approach paired with a random-shift argument.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Mads Anker Nielsen and Lars Rohwedder and Kevin Schewior</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 353, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.26</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-243920</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.26</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
