<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-23T20:16:00Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="24423" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:24423</identifier>
        <datestamp>2025-12-12T15:01:44Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>List-Recovery of Random Linear Codes over Small Fields</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Doron, Dean</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Mosheiff, Jonathan</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Resch, Nicolas</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Ribeiro, João</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>List recovery</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>random linear codes</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We study list-recoverability of random linear codes over small fields, both from errors and from erasures. We consider codes of rate ε-close to capacity, and aim to bound the dependence of the output list size L on ε, the input list size 𝓁, and the alphabet size q. Prior to our work, the best upper bound was L = q^O(𝓁/ε) (Zyablov and Pinsker, Prob. Per. Inf. 1981).&#13;
Previous work has identified cases in which linear codes provably perform worse than non-linear codes with respect to list-recovery. While there exist non-linear codes that achieve L = O(𝓁/ε), we know that L ≥ 𝓁^Ω(1/ε) is necessary for list recovery from erasures over fields of small characteristic, and for list recovery from errors over large alphabets.&#13;
We show that in other relevant regimes there is no significant price to pay for linearity, in the sense that we get the correct dependence on the gap-to-capacity ε and go beyond the Zyablov-Pinsker bound for the first time. Specifically, when q is constant and ε approaches zero,  &#13;
- For list-recovery from erasures over prime fields, we show that L ≤ C₁/ε. By prior work, such a result cannot be obtained for low-characteristic fields.&#13;
- For list-recovery from errors over arbitrary fields, we prove that L ≤ C₂/ε.  Above, C₁ and C₂ depend on the decoding radius, input list size, and field size. We provide concrete bounds on the constants above, and the upper bounds on L improve upon the Zyablov-Pinsker bound whenever q ≤ 2^{(1/ε)^c} for some small universal constant c &gt; 0.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Dean Doron and Jonathan Mosheiff and Nicolas Resch and João Ribeiro</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 353, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.57</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-244239</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.57</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
