<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-25T01:47:07Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="2446" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:2446</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:33:21Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Dynamic Sharing of a Multiple Access Channel</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Bienkowski, Marcin</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Klonowski, Marek</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Korzeniowski, Miroslaw</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Kowalski, Dariusz R.</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Distributed algorithms</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>multiple access channel</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>mutual exclusion</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>In this paper we consider the mutual exclusion problem on a multiple access channel. Mutual exclusion is one of the fundamental problems in distributed computing. In the classic version of this problem, $n$ processes perform a concurrent program which occasionally triggers some of them to use shared resources, such as memory, communication channel, device, etc. The goal is to design a distributed algorithm to control entries and exits to/from the shared resource in such a way that in any time there is at most one process accessing it.&#13;
We consider both the classic and a slightly weaker version of mutual exclusion, called $\ep$-mutual-exclusion, where for each period of a process staying in the critical section the probability that there is some other process in the critical section is at most $\ep$.&#13;
&#13;
We show that there are channel settings, where the classic mutual exclusion is not feasible even for randomized algorithms, while $\ep$-mutual-exclusion is. In more relaxed channel settings, we prove an exponential gap between the makespan complexity of the classic mutual exclusion problem and its weaker $\ep$-exclusion version.&#13;
&#13;
We also show how to guarantee fairness of mutual exclusion algorithms, i.e., that each process that wants to enter the critical section will eventually succeed.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Marcin Bienkowski and Marek Klonowski and Miroslaw Korzeniowski and Dariusz R. Kowalski</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2010</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 5, 27th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (2010)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2010.2446</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-24467</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2010.2446</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
