<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-22T14:05:05Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="2464" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:2464</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:33:23Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Dispersion in Unit Disks</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Dumitrescu, Adrian</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Jiang, Minghui</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Dispersion problem</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>linear programming</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>approximation algorithm</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We present two new approximation algorithms with (improved) constant ratios for selecting $n$ points in $n$ unit disks such that the minimum pairwise distance among the points is maximized.  &#13;
&#13;
(I) A very simple $O(n \log{n})$-time algorithm with ratio $0.5110$ for disjoint unit disks. In combination with an algorithm of Cabello~\cite{Ca07}, it yields a $O(n^2)$-time algorithm&#13;
with ratio of $0.4487$ for dispersion in $n$ not necessarily disjoint&#13;
unit disks.  &#13;
&#13;
(II) A more sophisticated LP-based algorithm with ratio $0.6495$ for&#13;
disjoint unit disks that uses a linear number of variables and&#13;
constraints, and runs in polynomial time. &#13;
The algorithm introduces a novel technique which combines linear&#13;
programming and projections for approximating distances. &#13;
&#13;
The previous best approximation ratio for disjoint unit disks was $\frac{1}{2}$. Our results give a partial answer to an open question raised by Cabello~\cite{Ca07}, who asked whether $\frac{1}{2}$ could be improved.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Adrian Dumitrescu and Minghui Jiang</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2010</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 5, 27th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (2010)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2010.2464</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-24646</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2010.2464</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
