<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-20T11:16:36Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="24883" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:24883</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-02-09T07:42:23Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Brief Announcement: Single-Round Broadcast: Impossibility, Feasibility, and More</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Zhou, Zhelei</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Zhang, Bingsheng</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Zhou, Hong-Sheng</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Ren, Kui</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Broadcast</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Security with abort</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Round optimality</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Broadcast is a fundamental primitive that plays an important role in secure Multi-Party Computation (MPC) area. In this work, we revisit the broadcast with selective abort (hereafter, short for broadcast) proposed by Goldwasser and Lindell (DISC 2002; JoC 2005) and study the round complexity of broadcast under different setup assumptions. Our findings are summarized as follows:  &#13;
- We formally prove that 1-round broadcast is impossible under various widely-used setup assumptions (e.g., plain model, random oracle model, and common reference string model, etc.), even if we consider the static security and the stand-alone framework. More concretely, we formalize a notion called consistent oracle to capture these setups, and prove that our impossibility holds under the consistent oracle. Our impossibility holds in both honest majority setting and dishonest majority setting.&#13;
- We show that 1-round broadcast protocol is possible in the Universal Composition (UC) framework, by assuming stateful trusted hardwares. Our protocol can be proven secure against all-but-one adaptive and malicious corruptions. We bypass our impossibility result since our stateful trusted hardwares do not satisfy the definition of consistent oracle.&#13;
- We provide an application of 1-round broadcast: we construct the first 1-round multiple-verifier zero-knowledge (which is a special case of MPC) protocol, without assuming the broadcast hybrid world.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Zhelei Zhou and Bingsheng Zhang and Hong-Sheng Zhou and Kui Ren</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 356, 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.66</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248838</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.66</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
