<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-31T03:21:22Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="24957" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:24957</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-02-09T08:02:36Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Maximizing Social Welfare Among EF1 Allocations at the Presence of Two Types of Agents</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Ma, Jiaxuan</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Chen, Yong</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Chen, Guangting</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Gong, Mingyang</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Lin, Guohui</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Zhang, An</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Fair allocation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>utilitarian social welfare</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>envy-free up to one item</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>envy-cycle elimination</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>round robin</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>approximation algorithm</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We study the fair allocation of indivisible items to n agents to maximize the utilitarian social welfare, where the fairness criterion is envy-free up to one item and there are only two different utility functions shared by the agents. We present a 2-approximation algorithm when the two utility functions are normalized, improving the previous best ratio of 16 √n shown for general normalized utility functions; thus this constant ratio approximation algorithm confirms the APX-completeness in this special case previously shown APX-hard. When there are only three agents, i.e., n = 3, the previous best ratio is 3 shown for general utility functions, and we present an improved and tight 5/3-approximation algorithm when the two utility functions are normalized, and a best possible and tight 2-approximation algorithm when the two utility functions are unnormalized.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Jiaxuan Ma and Yong Chen and Guangting Chen and Mingyang Gong and Guohui Lin and An Zhang</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 359, 36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.49</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-249570</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.49</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
