<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-24T05:11:54Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="25013" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:25013</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-02-09T07:53:34Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Geometry Matters in Planar Storyplans</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Dobler, Alexander</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Holzmüller, Maximilian</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Nöllenburg, Martin</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>geometric storyplan</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>planarity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>straight-line drawing</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>dynamic graph drawing</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>A storyplan visualizes a graph G = (V,E) as a sequence of 𝓁 frames Γ₁, … , Γ_𝓁, each of which is a drawing of the induced subgraph G[V_i] of a vertex subset V_i ⊆ V. Moreover, each vertex v ∈ V is contained in a single consecutive sequence of frames Γ_i, … , Γ_j, all vertices and edges contained in consecutive frames are drawn identically, and the union of all frames is a drawing of G. In GD 2022, the concept of planar storyplans was introduced, in which each frame must be a planar (topological) drawing. Several (parameterized) complexity results for recognizing graphs that admit a planar storyplan were provided, including NP-hardness. In this paper, we investigate an open question posed in the GD paper and show that the geometric and topological settings of the planar storyplan problem differ: We provide an instance of a graph that admits a planar storyplan, but no planar geometric storyplan, in which each frame is a planar straight-line drawing. Still, by adapting the reduction proof from the topological to the geometric setting, we show that recognizing the graphs that admit planar geometric storyplans remains NP-hard.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Alexander Dobler and Maximilian Holzmüller and Martin Nöllenburg</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.27</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250135</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.27</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
