<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-15T06:22:40Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="25150" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:25150</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-02-09T08:17:54Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Bridging Treewidth and Clique-Width via Cograph-Modular-Treewidth</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Blažej, Václav</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Jana, Satyabrata</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Ramanujan, M. S.</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Strulo, Peter</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Treewidth</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Clique-width</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Cograph</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>FPT</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>W[1]-hard</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Many classical graph problems - such as Max Cut, Chromatic Number, Edge Dominating Set, and Hamiltonian Cycle - are polynomial-time solvable on cographs, fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) when parameterized by treewidth, but W[1]-hard when parameterized by clique-width. In contrast, Graph Isomorphism is FPT parameterized by treewidth, but for clique-width it is known to be in XP; whether it is FPT or W[1]-hard is open.&#13;
This reveals a sharp tractability gap between treewidth and clique-width. In this work, we propose a new structural graph parameter, 𝒞-modular-treewidth, which lies between treewidth and clique-width. The parameter leverages modular decomposition and restricts modules to induce graphs from a fixed class 𝒞 (e.g., cographs or edgeless graphs). By exploiting true and false twins - a hallmark of cograph-like structure - our parameter allows the design of efficient algorithms for several hard problems beyond the reach of treewidth-based methods. In this work, we show that 𝒞-modular-treewidth enables efficient solutions under suitable choices of 𝒞, opening a new pathway in the parameterized complexity landscape between treewidth and clique-width. In particular we show that &#13;
- When parameterized by cograph-modular-treewidth, Isomorphism admits an FPT algorithm, whereas Chromatic Number remains W[1]-hard. &#13;
- When parameterized by independent-modular-treewidth, Hamiltonian Cycle and Edge Dominating Set remain W[1]-hard.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Václav Blažej and Satyabrata Jana and M. S. Ramanujan and Peter Strulo</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 358, 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.18</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251507</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.18</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
