<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-22T04:54:19Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="2526" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:2526</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:09:09Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Proof Complexity of Propositional Default Logic</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Beyersdorff, Olaf</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Meier, Arne</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Müller, Sebastian</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Thomas, Michael</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Vollmer, Heribert</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Proof complexity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>default logic</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>sequent calculus</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Default logic is one of the most popular and successful formalisms&#13;
for non-monotonic reasoning. In 2002, Bonatti and Olivetti&#13;
introduced several sequent calculi for credulous and skeptical&#13;
reasoning in propositional default logic. In this paper we examine&#13;
these calculi from a proof-complexity perspective. In particular, we&#13;
show that the calculus for credulous reasoning obeys almost the same&#13;
bounds on the proof size as Gentzen's system LK. Hence proving&#13;
lower bounds for credulous reasoning will be as hard as proving&#13;
lower bounds for LK. On the other hand, we show an exponential&#13;
lower bound to the proof size in Bonatti and Olivetti's enhanced&#13;
calculus for skeptical default reasoning.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Olaf Beyersdorff and Arne Meier and Sebastian Müller and Michael Thomas and Heribert Vollmer</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2010</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 10061, Circuits, Logic, and Games (2010)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.10061.5</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-25261</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.10061.5</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
