2026-10-11T04:21:16Z https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai

oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:25384 2026-03-19T12:04:19Z ddc:004 open_access

One-Way Functions and Boundary Hardness of Randomized Time-Bounded Kolmogorov Complexity Liu, Yanyi Pass, Rafael One-way functions Time-Bounded Kolmogorov Complexity Worst-case to Average-case Reductions We revisit the question of whether worst-case hardness of the time-bounded Kolmogorov complexity problem, MINK^{poly} - that is, determining whether a string is "structured" (i.e., K^t(x) < n-1) or "random" (i.e., K^{poly(t)} ≥ n-1) - suffices to imply the existence of one-way functions (OWF). Liu-Pass (CRYPTO'25) recently showed that worst-case hardness of a boundary version of MINK^{poly} - where, roughly speaking, the goal is to decide whether given an instance x, (a) x is K^poly-random (i.e., K^{poly(t)}(x) ≥ n-1), or just close to K^poly-random (i.e., K^{t}(x) < n-1 but K^{poly(t)} > n - log n) - characterizes OWF, but with either of the following caveats (1) considering a non-standard notion of probabilistic K^t, as opposed to the standard notion of K^t, or (2) assuming somewhat strong, and non-standard, derandomization assumptions. In this paper, we present an alternative method for establishing their result which enables significantly weakening the caveats. First, we show that boundary hardness of the more standard randomized K^t problem suffices (where randomized K^t(x) is defined just like K^t(x) except that the program generating the string x may be randomized). As a consequence of this result, we can provide a characterization also in terms of just "plain" K^t under the most standard derandomization assumption (used to derandomize just BPP into P) - namely E ̸ ⊆ ioSIZE[2^{o(n)}]. Our proof relies on language compression schemes of Goldberg-Sipser (STOC'85); using the same technique, we also present the the first worst-case to average-case reduction for the exact MINK^{poly} problem (under the same standard derandomization assumption), improving upon Hirahara’s celebrated results (STOC'18, STOC'21) that only applied to a gap version of the MINK^{poly} problem, referred to as GapMINK^{poly}, where the goal is to decide whether K^t(x) ≤ n-O(log n)) or K^{poly(t)}(x) ≥ n-1 and under the same derandomization assumption. Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik Yanyi Liu and Rafael Pass 2026 Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026) InProceedings Text doc-type:ResearchArticle publishedVersion application/pdf doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.97 urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253849 https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.97 eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode