<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-24T17:55:50Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="2545" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:2545</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:09:10Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Recent Hardness Results for Periodic Uni-processor Scheduling</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Eisenbrand, Friedrich</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Rothvoss, Thomas</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Hardness</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>periodic scheduling</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>uni-processor scheduling</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Consider a set of $n$ periodic tasks $	au_1,ldots,	au_n$ where $	au_i$ is described&#13;
by an execution time $c_i$, a (relative) deadline $d_i$ and a period $p_i$.&#13;
We assume that jobs are released synchronously (i.e. at each multiple of $p_i$) and consider pre-emptive, uni-processor schedules.&#13;
&#13;
We show that computing the response time of a task $	au_n$ in a Rate-monotonic schedule&#13;
i.e. computing&#13;
[&#13;
  minleft{ r geq mid c_n + sum_{i=1}^{n-1} leftlceil frac{r}{p_i} &#13;
ight&#13;
ceil c_i leq r &#13;
ight} &#13;
]&#13;
is (weakly) $mathbf{NP}$-hard (where $	au_n$ has the lowest priority and the deadlines&#13;
are implicit, i.e. $d_i = p_i$).  &#13;
&#13;
Furthermore we obtain that verifying EDF-schedulability, i.e.&#13;
[&#13;
  forall Q geq 0: sum_{i=1}^n left( leftlfloor frac{Q-d_i}{p_i} &#13;
ight&#13;
floor +1&#13;
ight)cdot c_i leq Q&#13;
]&#13;
for constrained-deadline tasks ($d_i leq p_i$) is weakly $mathbf{coNP}$-hard.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Friedrich Eisenbrand and Thomas Rothvoss</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2010</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 10071, Scheduling (2010)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.10071.10</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-25458</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.10071.10</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
