<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-09-05T11:58:24Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="25869" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:25869</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-06-23T12:59:56Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Computing the Bottleneck Distance Between Persistent Homology Transforms</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Kerber, Michael</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Wang, Elena Xinyi</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Kinetic data structure</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>bottleneck distance</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>persistent homology transform</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>vineyards</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>The Persistent Homology Transform (PHT) summarizes a shape in ℝ^m by collecting persistence diagrams obtained from linear height filtrations in all directions on 𝕊^{m-1}. It enjoys strong theoretical guarantees, including continuity, stability, and injectivity. A natural way to compare two PHTs is to use the bottleneck distance between their diagrams as the direction varies. Prior work has either compared PHTs by sampling directions or, in 2D, computed the exact integral of bottleneck distance over all angles via a kinetic data structure. We improve the integral objective to Õ(n⁵) in place of the earlier Õ(n⁶) bound, where n denotes the number of simplices. For the max objective, we give an Õ(n³) expected-time algorithm in ℝ² and an Õ(n⁵) expected-time algorithm in ℝ³.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Michael Kerber and Elena Xinyi Wang</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 367, 42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.62</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-258693</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.62</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
