<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-09-05T11:55:18Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="25874" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:25874</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-06-23T13:00:00Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Non-Dissective Coverings by Planks</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Kupavskii, Andrey</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Pach, János</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Tarski’s plank problem</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>translative cover</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>non-dissective cover</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>A plank is the part of space between two parallel planes. The following open problem, posed 45 years ago, can be viewed as the converse of Tarski’s plank problem (Bang’s theorem): Is it true that if the total width of a collection of planks is sufficiently large, then the planks can be individually translated to cover a unit ball B?&#13;
A translative covering of B by planks is said to be non-dissective if the planks can be added one by one, in some order, such that the uncovered part remains connected at each step and is empty at the end. Improving a classical result of Groemer, we show that every set of C/ε^{7/4} planks of width ε admits a non-dissective translative covering of a 3-dimensional ball B³, provided C is large enough. Our proof yields a low-complexity algorithm. We also show that c/ε^{4/3} planks are, in general, insufficient for a non-dissective covering of B³. This provides the first non-trivial lower bound for this problem.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Andrey Kupavskii and János Pach</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 367, 42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.67</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-258743</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.67</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
