<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-20T05:58:30Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="26314" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:26314</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-07-16T10:50:11Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Conditional Autarkies: Hard Formulas Made Easy</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Bonacina, Ilario</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Bonet, Maria Luisa</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Kolokolova, Antonina</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Lauria, Massimo</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>conditional autarkies</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>perfect matching principle</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>pigeonhole principle</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>redundancy rules</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>proof complexity</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>State-of-the-art SAT solvers increasingly use techniques beyond resolution. For instance, adding redundant clauses allows the solver to reduce the solution space, e.g., to break symmetries. We investigate the strength of relatively weak redundancy reasoning: conditional autarkies and set-blocked clauses, with no new variables and no deletions. &#13;
We show that adding conditional autarkies (as set-blocked clauses) on top of resolution allows efficient refutations of a number of natural combinatorial principles that may occur in SAT benchmarks. In particular, we give efficient proofs of the perfect matching on a grid, the mutilated chessboard, the counting principle modulo 3, and the relativized pigeonhole principle.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Ilario Bonacina and Maria Luisa Bonet and Antonina Kolokolova and Massimo Lauria</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 377, 29th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2026)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2026.8</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-263145</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2026.8</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
