<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-09-08T02:21:58Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="26522" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:26522</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-05T19:46:19Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Partially-Dynamic Maximum Flow in Dense Graphs</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Kravchenko, Egor</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Probst Gutenberg, Maximilian</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Maximum Flow</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Dynamic Graph Algorithm</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Data Structure</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We give the first algorithms that, with high probability, maintain (1-ε)-approximate s-t maximum flow in an n-vertex undirected, capacitated graph undergoing either only edge insertions or only edge deletions in total update time Õ_ε(n²). For dense graphs, this yields polylogarithmic amortized update time, which was previously only obtained for the special case of uncapacitated graphs undergoing edge insertions. &#13;
We develop the following two algorithms:  &#13;
- For graphs undergoing deletions, we generalize the congestion-balancing framework from [Aaron Bernstein et al., 2020], which was developed for maximum matching. We then show that this framework can be simulated on cut sparsifiers, which yields significant speed-ups. &#13;
- For graphs undergoing insertions, we show that the sparsification techniques by Eppstein et al. [Eppstein et al., 1997] can be combined more directly with the techniques from Henzinger and Goranci [Goranci and Henzinger, 2023]. We thereby bypass the need to dynamize the more involved residual graph sparsification approach by Levin and Karger [Karger and Levine, 2015] suggested in [Goranci et al., 2025], and extend their result to capacitated graphs.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Egor Kravchenko and Maximilian Probst Gutenberg</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 374, 53rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2026)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2026.133</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-265226</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2026.133</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
