<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-22T06:11:23Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="26572" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:26572</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-07-01T07:16:15Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Approximating 1-In-3 SAT by Linearly Ordered Hypergraph 3-Colouring Is NP-Hard</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Krokhin, Andrei</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Vagnozzi, Danny</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Constraint satisfaction</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>complexity theory</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>1-in-3 SAT is a classical NP-hard constraint satisfaction problem (CSP). Given a satisfiable instance of 1-in-3 SAT, it is NP-hard to find a satisfying assignment for it, but it may be possible to efficiently find a solution subject to a weaker (not necessarily Boolean) predicate than "1-in-3". There is a conjecture, which we call the Approximate 1-in-3 SAT conjecture, made independently by several researchers, that predicts a dichotomy: for certain choices of weaker predicates the problem becomes tractable and for the remaining choices the task remains NP-hard. Such problems belong to the Promise CSP (PCSP) framework, which studies how one CSP can be approximated by another, in a specific qualitative sense. The Approximate 1-in-3 SAT conjecture is notable because there is no P versus NP-hard dichotomy conjecture for general PCSPs yet (due to insufficient evidence). One specific predicate, corresponding to the problem of linearly ordered 3-colouring of 3-uniform hypergraphs, has been mentioned in several recent papers as an obstacle to further progress in proving the Approximate 1-in-3 SAT conjecture. We prove that the problem for this predicate is NP-hard, as predicted by the conjecture. This completes the proof of the conjecture for predicates on a 3-element domain.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Andrei Krokhin and Danny Vagnozzi</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 374, 53rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2026)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2026.184</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-265729</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2026.184</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
