<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-14T00:27:37Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="27098" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:27098</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-08-12T06:00:27Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Weak Zero-Knowledge and One-Way Functions</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Chatterjee, Rohit</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Li, Yunqi</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Vasudevan, Prashant Nalini</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>One-way functions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>zero-knowledge</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We study the implications of the existence of weak Zero-Knowledge (ZK) protocols for worst-case hard languages. These are protocols that have completeness, soundness, and zero-knowledge errors (denoted ε_c, ε_s, and ε_z, respectively) that might not be negligible. Under the assumption that there are worst-case hard languages in NP, we show the following:  &#13;
1) If all languages in NP have NIZK proofs or arguments satisfying ε_c+ε_s+ε_z &lt; 1, then One-Way Functions (OWFs) exist. This covers all possible non-trivial values for these error rates. It additionally implies that if all languages in NP have such NIZK proofs and ε_c is negligible, then they also have NIZK proofs where all errors are negligible. Previously, these results were known under the more restrictive condition ε_c+√{ε_s}+ε_z &lt; 1 [Chakraborty et al., CRYPTO 2025]. &#13;
2) If all languages in NP have k-round public-coin ZK proofs or arguments satisfying ε_c+ε_s+(2k-1)⋅ε_z &lt; 1, then OWFs exist.&#13;
3) If, for some constant k, all languages in NP have k-round public-coin ZK proofs or arguments satisfying ε_c+ε_s+k⋅ε_z &lt; 1, then infinitely-often OWFs exist.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Rohit Chatterjee and Yunqi Li and Prashant Nalini Vasudevan</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 385, 7th Conference on Information-Theoretic Cryptography (ITC 2026)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ITC.2026.5</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-270987</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITC.2026.5</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
