<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-21T18:34:56Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="27451" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:27451</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-08-21T14:42:40Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>On the Tension Between Full-Rankness and Self-Reducibility for Set-Multilinear Polynomials</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Kush, Deepanshu</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Algebraic formula lower bounds</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>set-multilinear formulas</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>iterated matrix multiplication</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>rank methods</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>hardness escalation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>self-reducibility</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>barriers</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>In this paper, we rule out a natural programme for proving VF ≠ VNP via set-multilinear formula lower bounds. The programme combines two ingredients present in the literature: the n^Ω(log n) set-multilinear formula lower bound of Kush and Saraf (CCC 2022) for any full-rank polynomial, and an IMM-style self-reducibility that propagates such a bound to small degree, where Raz’s set-multilinearisation (J. ACM 2013) converts it to a general formula lower bound. Each ingredient has been realised separately, yet no polynomial family is known to combine them. We prove that no such family can exist: under any polynomial-width IMM-style self-reducibility - i.e., a small-width expression g = ∑_{k=1}^w L_k ⋅ R_k with each summand factoring across a balanced split - full-rankness forces width n^Ω(d), and even approximate full-rankness across a near-balanced split forces width n^Ω(√d). This rules out the full-rank/self-reducible route to VF ≠ VNP.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Deepanshu Kush</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 386, 51st International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2026)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2026.69</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-274512</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2026.69</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
