<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-09-10T09:44:58Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="27548" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:27548</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-10T05:38:42Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>RCC-8 as a Benchmark for Diagrammatic Reasoning in Multimodal Foundation Models</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Blackwell, Robert E</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Cohn, Anthony G</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Large Language Models</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Foundation Models</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Vision-Language Models</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Spatial Reasoning</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Diagrammatic Reasoning</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Diagrams are commonly used to define relations in qualitative spatial calculi, and humans routinely rely on diagrams for spatial reasoning. Thus the question arises: can multimodal AI foundation models make use of diagrams for qualitative spatial reasoning? Using the Region Connection Calculus (RCC-8), a well-known qualitative spatial calculus, we investigate three capabilities: whether Vision–Language Models (VLMs) can recognise RCC-8 spatial relation diagrams, whether text-to-image and text-to-video models can illustrate RCC-8 relations, and whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can exploit diagrammatic reasoning. We show that, while no state-of-the-art model is fully reliable, the best models typically recognise vector diagrams more accurately than raster diagrams, albeit with problems recognising relations with a precise tangent. Diagrams with squares or circles are more readily recognisable than triangles or blobs. State-of-the-art LLMs can answer composition questions remarkably well, but there is little evidence that they benefit from explicit prompting for diagrammatic reasoning. Although state-of-the-art image and video generation models are widely used to, for example, produce social media content, they struggle to provide accurate RCC-8 relation or conceptual neighbourhood illustrations except when SVG is the output format.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Robert E Blackwell and Anthony G Cohn</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 393, 17th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2026)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.COSIT.2026.4</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-275489</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.COSIT.2026.4</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
