<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-09-10T09:44:54Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="27771" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:27771</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-09T12:19:38Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Load Balancing Under Adaptive Bin Deletions</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Kaplan, Haim</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Sapir, Shay</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Stemmer, Uri</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Balls and Bins</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Adaptive Adversary</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We analyze a balls-and-bins game against an adaptive adversary that sequentially deletes bins. Starting with n balls distributed across n bins, the adversary deletes a bin in each step, forcing the algorithm to redistribute its balls to surviving bins. We prove that after n/2 rounds, uniform random redistribution yields optimal O(n) recourse and O((log n)/(log log n)) maximum load. Furthermore, we show that applying the "power of two choices" reduces the maximum load to O(log log n) while maintaining linear recourse. &#13;
We also consider a variation of this game where the balls from the deleted bin are partitioned evenly among d ≪ n random bins rather than being redistributed independently. We demonstrate that keeping the balls together (d = 1), which gives small maximum load and recourse against an oblivious adversary, fails against an adaptive adversary. Nevertheless, we show that splitting the balls into just two groups (d = 2) is sufficient to recover linear recourse and efficient load balancing in the adaptive setting.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Haim Kaplan and Shay Sapir and Uri Stemmer</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 392, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2026)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2026.54</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-277711</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2026.54</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
