<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-02T22:37:42Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="27873" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:27873</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-10-02T17:40:22Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Competing Auctions in Intermediated Markets</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Mazorra, Bruno</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Pan, Minghao</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Schlegel, Christoph</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Competing auctions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>proposer-builder separation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>maximal extractable value</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We analyze competing auctions in intermediated markets, where a seller selects among parallel mechanisms for the sale of a single good, most prominently the relay-and-protocol architecture of proposer-builder separation in Ethereum.&#13;
When the intermediary can enforce single-homing on its bidders, sealed-bid second-price intermediary auctions fully unravel into the sealed first-price principal auction; open bidding-format intermediaries unravel only partially, collapsing into first-price in equilibrium under symmetric latency and sorting fast bidders to the intermediary under asymmetric latency. Any last-look advantage is removed through the availability of a credible sealed bidding channel. These results extend to multi-plexing environments (no enforcement by the intermediary).&#13;
While the unraveling result indicates that the availability of a sealed first-price bidding channel pushes the overall market to the same auction structure, the very assumption of the credibility of such a channel is problematic, as the seller may have an incentive to leak information: a first-price auction is leakage-resistant in the presence of a single "fast" bidder but not against two or more. However, if the seller can credibly commit to not leak bids, it is optimal for them to do so. &#13;
A main motivation is the forthcoming Glamsterdam update of Ethereum: our analysis suggests that the availability of an in-protocol (first-price) bidding channel severely limits the design space for out-of-protocol auctions by relays and other intermediaries.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Bruno Mazorra and Minghao Pan and Christoph Schlegel</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 395, 8th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2026)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2026.19</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-278738</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2026.19</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
