<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-03T22:41:34Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="27882" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:27882</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-10-02T17:40:23Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Inside Qubic’s Selfish Mining Campaign on Monero: Evidence, Tactics, and Limits</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Lee, Suhyeon</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Kim, Hyeongyeong</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Blockchain</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Proof-of-Work</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Selfish Mining</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Monero</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>In 2025, the blockchain network Qubic conducted a mining campaign on Monero, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency. It publicly presented the campaign as a "51% takeover" and a demonstration of selfish mining. The episode provides a rare opportunity to test such claims in a privacy-preserving proof-of-work network, where pool attribution and private release decisions are difficult to observe. We combine Monero node measurements, Qubic pool observations, community-shared artifacts, and disclosed view keys to attribute blocks and identify candidate withholding periods. Rather than sustained majority control, we observe elevated orphaning and deeper reorganizations. Qubic did not follow a single optimized selfish mining strategy, instead varying between standard selfish mining and more defensive block-release decisions. Across the campaign, it gained no reward advantage over honest mining. Community monitoring and Qubic’s countermeasures reveal how real-world mining campaigns evolve in response to an active ecosystem. Overall, the campaign disrupted Monero without exhibiting a stable profit-maximizing strategy, leaving open disruptive incentives beyond direct mining rewards.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Suhyeon Lee and Hyeongyeong Kim</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 395, 8th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2026)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2026.28</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-278821</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2026.28</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
