<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-02T23:07:12Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="27883" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:27883</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-10-02T17:40:23Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>When Does Being Selfish Pay Off? Temporal Composability and Profitability in Selfish Mining</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Finkbeiner, Colin</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Shaw, Connor</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Almashaqbeh, Ghada</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Bitcoin</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Proof of work</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Selfish mining</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Temporal mining strategies</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Selfish mining undermines incentive compatibility of proof-of-work blockchains, letting a miner earn disproportionate rewards at a hashrate lower than the majority threshold. A decade of research has investigated whether a strategy is profitable, however, far less is understood about when it becomes profitable. Timing is critical since selfish mining operates at a loss before it turns a profit, typically requiring tens of weeks to break even in the classic case.&#13;
In this paper, we present a holistic study of the time-to-profitability (TTP) of existing selfish mining strategies structured around four contributions. First, in the single-attacker setting, we characterize TTP across the full strategy space and find that TTP-minimizing and profit-maximizing strategies frequently diverge, making attack horizon a critical metric. In particular, under realistic fee dynamics, the use of incentive transactions to recruit honest-but-rational miners enables reaching profitability up to 15× faster than classic selfish mining at the same hash rate. Second, we study TTP for the first time in the multi-attacker setting, showing that the difference in strategies between opposing attackers has a dramatic impact on join profitability. Third, we generalize intermittent selfish mining by examining temporal composition over the full strategy space and showing that its purported benefits are largely overstated; alternating strategies rarely outperforms the best static strategy in terms of TTP and long-term profits.&#13;
Finally, and building on these findings, we investigate adaptive, state-conditioned strategy selection at the difficulty adjustment period (DAP) level. We compare a general-purpose LLM agent against a fixed decision-tree selector. We find that both selectors reliably identify profit-maximizing strategies from observed network conditions, at a low operational cost, thus lowering the expertise barrier to exploiting adaptive selfish mining.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Colin Finkbeiner and Connor Shaw and Ghada Almashaqbeh</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 395, 8th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2026)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2026.29</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-278839</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2026.29</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
