<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-03T22:35:11Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="27888" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:27888</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-10-02T17:40:23Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>EVM Workloads in the Wild: Evidence for Multi-Dimensional Gas Metering, State Growth, Delayed Execution, and Parallelism</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Heimbach, Lioba</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Babel, Kushal</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Milionis, Jason</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Ethereum</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>EVM</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>gas metering</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>state growth</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>workload analysis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Layer-2</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Gas metering on EVM-compatible blockchains assumes that execution conditions are stable: that the resource mix is constant enough to justify collapsing execution costs into a single scalar with fixed relative prices, and that state drift between submission and execution time does not materially alter a transaction’s outcome. We measure the extent to which this assumption fails.&#13;
We present a trace-level measurement study of EVM workloads on Ethereum (L1) and Base (L2) throughout 2025, sampling 3{,}000 blocks per day per chain. We decompose each transaction into opcode-level execution gas, intrinsic gas, refunds, and persistent state deltas including storage slots, contract bytecode, and account state. To measure state sensitivity, we re-execute transactions sampled during September 2025 on progressively older blockchain states and record how gas usage, execution outcomes, and storage access patterns change.&#13;
We find the resource mix to be far from stable: on Base, storage reads and compute account for 29.2% and 24.3% of execution gas, while Ethereum devotes 34.9% to storage writes. The mix is not stable on the same chain either: Ethereum’s gas limit doubling during 2025 shifted its resource profile measurably toward more compute-heavy, Base-like patterns. Base also exhibits a higher fraction of cold storage reads at 49.7%, compared to 39.6% on Ethereum. Persistent state growth, a permanent cost priced as a transient one, reaches 435 GB on Base versus 30 GB on Ethereum, with different composition.&#13;
We further find that execution outcomes are equally unstable: gas estimates vary across nearby historical states for 46.0% of transactions on Base, compared to 13.9% on Ethereum, with especially high sensitivity for MEV and DeFi activity. Storage access patterns also diverge across execution states, limiting the effectiveness of access lists and complicating parallel execution.&#13;
Our measurements provide an empirical foundation for multi-dimensional gas metering and explicit pricing of state growth. They show that state-sensitive execution behavior complicates workload estimation and transaction parameterization, directly affecting the predictability of transactions' execution and user experience.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Lioba Heimbach and Kushal Babel and Jason Milionis</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 395, 8th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2026)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2026.34</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-278883</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2026.34</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
