<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-05T21:32:41Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="28021" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:28021</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-10-05T06:44:05Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>PQC-Readiness of Open-Source Software: An Empirical Study</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Mehl, Lukas</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>post-quantum cryptography</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>static analysis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>empirical study</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>open-source software</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>cryptographic primitives</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Migrating open-source systems to post-quantum cryptography requires knowing where classical public-key primitives still appear in code, yet much empirical work has targeted dependency graphs or misuse of APIs rather than primitive-level, multi-language usage at scale. This paper describes a static analyzer that scans Python, Java, and Go repositories using syntax-aware parsing, classifies cryptographic calls and imports as post-quantum-vulnerable, quantum-safe, or PQC-ready, and aggregates findings for ecosystem-level measurement.&#13;
Applied to a stratified sample of about fourteen and a half thousand GitHub repositories, vulnerable primitives are found to be widespread at the level of explicit calls and imports, with strongly language-dependent rates shaped in part by how transport and certificate stacks are treated in static analysis. Evidence of PQC-ready APIs is exceedingly rare by comparison, underscoring a stark adoption gap relative to migration goals. Methodological limitations are stated so the baseline can be interpreted, reproduced, and extended.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Lukas Mehl</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 394, 20th International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2026)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ESEM.2026.53</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-280211</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESEM.2026.53</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
