<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-05T21:44:31Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="28042" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:28042</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-10-05T06:44:06Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Do Large-Scale Agile Frameworks Encode Socio-Technical Resilience?</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Uwasomba, Chukwudi</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Sharp, Helen</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Lopez, Tamara</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Wermelinger, Michel</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Deshpande, Advait</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Gregory, Peggy</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Large-scale agile frameworks</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Socio-technical resilience</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Resilience engineering</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Large-Scale Agile Frameworks (LSAFs) are widely used to coordinate agile transformation beyond individual teams. They are often associated with organisational adaptability, yet whether their formal guidance encodes the capabilities associated with socio-technical resilience (STR) is unclear. Drawing on Hollnagel’s resilience potentials, this vision paper presents observations from an initial investigation of how resilience-relevant capabilities are represented in formal LSAF guidance. These observations indicate a potential resilience blind spot in LSAFs. The paper identifies opportunities for further empirical work on LSAFs and resilience, and on how organisations supplement LSAFs with resilience-oriented practices.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Chukwudi Uwasomba and Helen Sharp and Tamara Lopez and Michel Wermelinger and Advait Deshpande and Peggy Gregory</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 394, 20th International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2026)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ESEM.2026.74</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-280422</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESEM.2026.74</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
