<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-20T05:31:57Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="2885" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:2885</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:33:41Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Quasi-Random PCP and Hardness of 2-Catalog Segmentation</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Saket, Rishi</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Hardness of Approximation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>PCPs</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Catalog Segmentation</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We study the problem of 2-Catalog Segmentation which is one of the several variants of segmentation problems, introduced by Kleinberg et al., that naturally arise in data mining applications. Formally, given a bipartite graph $G = (U, V, E)$ and parameter $r$, the goal is to output two subsets $V_1, V_2 subseteq V$, each of size $r$, to maximize, $sum_{u \in U} max {|E(u, V_1)|, |E(u, V_2)|},$ where $E(u, V_i)$ is the set of edges between $u$ and the vertices in $V_i$ for $i = 1, 2$. There is a simple 2-approximation for this problem, and stronger approximation factors are known for the special case when $r = |V|/2$. On the other hand, it is  known to be NP-hard, and Feige showed a constant factor hardness based on an assumption of average case hardness of random 3SAT. &#13;
&#13;
In this paper we show that there is no PTAS for $2$-Catalog Segmentation assuming that NP does not have subexponential time probabilistic algorithms, i.e. NP $\not\subseteq \cap_{\eps &gt; 0}$ BPTIME($2^{n^\eps}$). In order to prove our result we strengthen the analysis of the Quasi-Random PCP of Khot, which we transform into an instance of $2$-Catalog Segmentation. Our improved analysis of the Quasi-Random PCP proves stronger properties of the PCP which might be useful in other applications.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Rishi Saket</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2010</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 8, IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2010)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2010.447</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-28858</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2010.447</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
