<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-20T05:31:26Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="3035" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:3035</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:33:46Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Everywhere complex sequences and the probabilistic method</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Rumyantsev, Andrey Yu.</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Kolmogorov complexity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>everywhere complex sequences</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>randomized algorithms</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Medvedev reducibility</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Muchnik reducibility</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>The main subject of the paper is everywhere complex sequences. An everywhere complex sequence is a sequence that does not contain substrings of Kolmogorov complexity less than alpha n-O(1) where n is the length of the substring and alpha is a constant between 0 and 1.&#13;
&#13;
First, we prove that no randomized algorithm can produce an everywhere complex sequence with positive probability.&#13;
&#13;
On the other hand, for weaker notions of everywhere complex sequences the situation is different. For example, there is a probabilistic algorithm that produces (with probability 1) sequences whose substrings of length $n$ have complexity sqrt(n) - O(1).&#13;
&#13;
Finally, one may replace the complexity of a substring (in the definition of everywhere complex sequences) by its conditional complexity when the position is given. This gives a stronger notion of everywhere complex sequence, and no randomized algorithm can produce (with positive probability) such a sequence even if alpha n is replaced by sqrt(n), log*(n) or any other monotone unbounded computable function.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Andrey Yu. Rumyantsev</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2011</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 9, 28th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2011)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2011.464</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-30353</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2011.464</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
