<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-26T19:18:21Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="3126" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:3126</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:33:50Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>First-Order Unification on Compressed Terms</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Gascón, Adrià</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Maneth, Sebastian</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Ramos, Lander</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>unification</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>matching</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>grammars</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>compression</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>STG</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>system C++</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Singleton Tree Grammars (STGs) have recently drawn considerable&#13;
attention. They generalize the sharing of subtrees known from DAGs to&#13;
sharing of connected subgraphs. This allows to obtain smaller&#13;
in-memory representations of trees than with DAGs. In the past years&#13;
some important tree algorithms were proved to perform efficiently&#13;
(without decompression) over STGs; e.g., type checking, equivalence&#13;
checking, and unification. We present a tool that implements an&#13;
extension of the unification algorithm for STGs. This algorithm makes&#13;
extensive use of equivalence checking. For the latter we implemented&#13;
two variants, the classical exact one and a recent randomized one. Our&#13;
experiments show that the randomized algorithm performs better.  The&#13;
running times are also compared to those of unification over&#13;
uncompressed trees.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Adrià Gascón and Sebastian Maneth and Lander Ramos</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2011</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 10, 22nd International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA'11) (2011)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.RTA.2011.51</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-31263</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.RTA.2011.51</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
