<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-20T05:27:39Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="324" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:324</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:05:53Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Testing with Functions as Specifications</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Koopman, Pieter</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Automatic testing</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>model based testing</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>specification based testing</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>functions</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>In this paper we show that mathematical functions and&#13;
logical expressions can very well be used as, partial, specifications.&#13;
Reactive systems can be modelled by powerful extended state&#13;
transition systems, that can be nondeterministic and can handle&#13;
parameterized and infinite types for the inputs, outputs and states.&#13;
These specifications can very concisely and directly be stated in&#13;
a modern functional programming language.&#13;
The test tool Gast is able to generate test data based on these&#13;
specifications, execute the associated tests, and make a verdict fully&#13;
automatically.&#13;
Test data can be generated fully automatically,&#13;
but can also be tailored in various high level ways, if that is desired.&#13;
&#13;
Advantages of this approach are that one specifies properties instead&#13;
of instances of these properties,&#13;
test data are automatically derived instead of manually,&#13;
the tests performed are always up to date with the current specification,&#13;
and testing is automatic (and hence fast and accurate).</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Pieter Koopman</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2005</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 4371, Perspectives of Model-Based Testing (2005)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.04371.5</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-3246</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.04371.5</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
