<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-20T05:05:11Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="328" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:328</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T11:06:28Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Probabilistic Abduction Without Priors</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Dubois, Didier</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Gilio, Angelo</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Kern-Isberner, Gabriele</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Conditional probability</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Bayes Theorem</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>imprecise probability</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>entropy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>possibility theory</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>maximum likelihood</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>This paper considers the simple problem of abduction in the&#13;
framework of Bayes theorem, i.e. computing a posterior probability of an hypothesis when its prior probability is not available, either because there are no statistical data on which to rely on, or simply because a human&#13;
expert is reluctant to provide a subjective assessment of this&#13;
prior probability. The  problem remains an open issue since a&#13;
simple sensitivity analysis on the value of the unknown prior&#13;
yields empty results. This paper tries to survey and comment on&#13;
various solutions to this problem: the use of likelihood functions&#13;
(as in classical statistics), the use of information principles&#13;
like maximal entropy, Shapley value, maximum likelihood. We also&#13;
study the problem in the setting of de Finetti coherence approach,&#13;
which does not exclude conditioning on contingent events with zero&#13;
probability. We show that the ad hoc likelihood function method,&#13;
that can be reinterpreted in terms of possibility theory,  is&#13;
consistent with most other formal approaches. However, the maximal&#13;
entropy solution is significantly different.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Didier Dubois and Angelo Gilio and Gabriele Kern-Isberner</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2005</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 5321, Belief Change in Rational Agents: Perspectives from Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, and Economics (2005)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/DagSemProc.05321.13</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-3286</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.05321.13</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
