<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-07-22T11:26:21Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="3681" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:3681</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:34:22Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Herbrand-Confluence for Cut Elimination in Classical First Order Logic</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Hetzl, Stefan</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Straßburger, Lutz</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>proof theory</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>first-order logic</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>tree languages</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>term rewriting</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>semantics of proofs</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We consider cut-elimination in the sequent calculus for classical&#13;
first-order logic. It is well known that this system, in its most&#13;
general form, is neither confluent nor strongly normalizing. In this&#13;
work we take a coarser (and mathematically more realistic) look at&#13;
cut-free proofs. We analyze which witnesses they choose for which&#13;
quantifiers, or in other words: we only consider the&#13;
Herbrand-disjunction of a cut-free proof. Our main theorem is a&#13;
confluence result for a natural class of proofs: all (possibly&#13;
infinitely many) normal forms of the non-erasing reduction lead to the&#13;
same Herbrand-disjunction.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Stefan Hetzl and Lutz Straßburger</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2012</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 16, Computer Science Logic (CSL'12) - 26th International Workshop/21st Annual Conference of the EACSL (2012)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2012.320</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-36815</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2012.320</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
