<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-15T23:21:11Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="3932" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://drops.dagstuhl.de/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:drops-oai.dagstuhl.de:3932</identifier>
        <datestamp>2024-03-06T10:34:39Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>ddc:004</setSpec>
        <setSpec>open_access</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Two Hands Are Better Than One (up to constant factors): Self-Assembly In The 2HAM vs. aTAM</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Cannon, Sarah</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Demaine, Erik D.</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Demaine, Martin L.</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Eisenstat, Sarah</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Patitz, Matthew J.</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Schweller, Robert T.</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Summers, Scott M</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Winslow, Andrew</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>abstract tile assembly model</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>hierarchical tile assembly model</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>two-handed tile assembly model</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>algorithmic self-assembly</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>DNA computing</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>biocomputing</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>We study the difference between the standard seeded model (aTAM) of tile self-assembly, and the "seedless" two-handed model of tile self-assembly (2HAM).  Most of our results suggest that the two-handed model is more powerful. In particular, we show how to simulate any seeded system with a two-handed system that is essentially just a constant factor larger.  We exhibit finite shapes with a busy-beaver separation in the number of distinct tiles required by seeded versus two-handed, and exhibit an infinite shape that can be constructed two-handed but not seeded.  Finally, we show that verifying whether a given system uniquely assembles a desired supertile is co-NP-complete in the two-handed model, while it was known to be polynomially solvable in the seeded model.</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</dc:publisher>
          <dc:contributor>Sarah Cannon and Erik D. Demaine and Martin L. Demaine and Sarah Eisenstat and Matthew J. Patitz and Robert T. Schweller and Scott M Summers and Andrew Winslow</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2013</dc:date>
          <dc:relation>Is Part Of LIPIcs, Volume 20, 30th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2013)</dc:relation>
          <dc:type>InProceedings</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>doc-type:ResearchArticle</dc:type>
          <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2013.172</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-39321</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2013.172</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
